HJNO Jul/Aug 2025

HEALTHCARE JOURNAL OF NEW ORLEANS I  JUL / AUG 2025 31 tech_res/attach/pdf/shokuiku-1.pdf. 192 Nordic Council of Ministers. (2023, June 20). Nordic nutrition recommendations 2023: Integrating environmental aspects. https://www.norden.org/en/publication/ nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2023. 193 Delamaire, C., Escalon, E., & Noirot, L. (2019). Recommendations concerning diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour for adults (62 p.). Santé publique France. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr. 194 Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail (ANSES). (2024, January 17). ANSES updates its food consumption guidelines for the French population https://www.anses.fr/en/content/anses-updates-its-food-consumption-guidelines-french- population. 195 Kearns, C. E., Schmidt, L. A., & Glantz, S. A. (2016). Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(11), 1680–1685. 196 Nestle, M. (1993). Food lobbies, the food pyramid, and US nutrition policy. International Journal of Health Services, 23(3), 483-496. 197 Nestle, M. (2013). Food politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health. In Food Politics. University of California press. 198 Nestle M. (2018). Perspective: Challenges and Controversial Issues in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 1980-2015. Advances in nutrition 9(2), 148–150. https://doi. org/10.1093/advances/nmx022. 199 Mialon, M., Serodio, P. M., Crosbie, E., Teicholz, N., Naik, A., & Carriedo, A. (2022). Conflicts of interest for members of the US 2020 dietary guidelines advisory committee. Public health nutrition, 27(1), e69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000672. 200 Congressional Research Service. Federal crop insurance: specialty crops. R45459 (2019). 201 Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–334, Dec. 20, 2018); USDA Economic Research Service Based on Congressional Budget Office, Direct Spending Effects for the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill), December 11, 2018; USDA Budget Explanatory Notes, NIFA & AMS, 2021-2024. 202 Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Short history of SNAP. Retrieved May 5, 2025, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/history. 203 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—Key Statistics and Research | Economic Research Service. (n.d.). Retrieved May 4, 2025, from https://www.ers . usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap/key-statistics-and- research. 204 Bureau, U. C. (n.d.). Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): 2022. Census.Gov. Retrieved May 4, 2025, from https://www.census.gov/library/fact- sheets/2022/demo/p70fs-199.html. 205 Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). What Can SNAP Buy?. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligible-food- items. 206 Mande, J., & Flaherty, G. (2023). Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program as a health intervention. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 35(1), 33. 207 Smith, T. A., & Gregory, C. A. (2023). Food insecurity in the United States: Measurement, economic modeling, and food assistance effectiveness. Annual Review of Exposure Pathways It is critical to recognize that chemicals are important tools that are inextricably linked to economic growth and innovations - helping to feed, shelter, and power everyAmerican and maintain food safety standards. Yet regulatory and medical systems around the world largely evaluate chemicals or chemical classes individually and may be neglecting potential synergistic effects and cumulative burdens, thereby missing opportunities to translate cumulative risk assessment into the clinical environment in meaningful ways. 237 238 239 The cumulative effect of multiple chemical exposures and impact on children over time is not fully understood. 240 241 No country in the world has fully accounted for the fact that children are often exposed to complex mixtures of chemicals. The rapid progression of AI technology creates new opportunities to develop tools to better evaluate the environmental exposures of chronic dis- eases in children. 242 The great challenge of the next decade is for government and industry around the world to understand the impacts of the cumulative chemical exposure that a child faces. This presents an opportunity for American technologic innovation to develop new risk evaluation tools and to promote solutions. The U.S. government is committed to fostering radical transparency and gold-standard science to better understand the potential cumu- lative impacts of environmental exposures. We must understand and ameliorate any potential links between cumulative chemical expo- sure and childhood chronic disease. This cannot happen through a European regulatory system that stifles growth. It will happen through a renewed focus on fearless gold-standard science throughout the federal government and through unleashing private sector innovation to understand and reduce the cumulative chemical load on our children. It is critical the U.S. evaluate the current environmental regula- tory structure and determine ways to continue to promote economic growth through innovation, while also evolving our frameworks for promoting children’s health. Why Children Are Uniquely Vulnerable to Environmental Chemicals Children are not “little adults”when it comes to environmental chemicals. 243 Exposure to these substances can begin at conception and continue throughout childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood, accumulating over time. The placenta and umbilical cord do not serve as impenetrable barriers; they can allow hundreds of industrial chemicals and pollutants to reach the developing fetus. 244 Once children are exposed to these substances, several unique characteristics make newborns, children, and adolescents particularly vulnerable. Here are some key factors that heighten their risk: • Sensitive Developmental Windows: Even minor exposures during critical periods—in utero, infancy, early childhood, and adoles- cence—can result in developmental delays or permanent harm. 245 246 247 • Developing Immune Systems: Young children have maturing immune systems, making them susceptible to chemical exposures that can disrupt lifelong immune development. 248 249 • Detoxification Challenges: Babies struggle to detoxify chemicals as effectively as adults, allowing chemicals to accumulate in their smaller bodies. 250 251 • Accelerated Brain Development: Early childhood is marked by rapid brain development, with up to one million new neural connec- tions forming every second. 252 Toxic exposures during this time can derail neurodevelopment, leading to lifelong learning disabilities and behavioral disorders. 253 254 • Endocrine Disruption: Multiple developmental stages, from fetal growth to onset of puberty, are regulated via exquisitely sensitive hormonal signaling that can be disrupted by endocrine- disrupting chemicals, impacting growth trajectories and outcomes from